Main Article Content

Abstract

The increasing and widespread poverty in rural areas has given rise to many new concepts to overcome this problem, one of which is agrarian reform or reform of the agrarian structure. The core of the problem is that there are too many people who want to live, but are limited by the amount of cultivated land that is too small for farming households who depend on the land. One of the programs of the Joko Widodo government to overcome this problem is the Land Object of Agrarian Reform (TORA) Program. This study aims to look at the implementation of this program in Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi Province. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. While the theory used to see the implementation of the TORA program is Lewis and Flynn's bottom-up implementation model. The results of the research indicate that the agrarian reform policy through the TORA program, from planning to implementation, has never involved the discourse of the peasantry and placed farmers as its central object. The presence of this program is nothing but to negate farmers from the sources of their own wealth assets, and in the end this program is not a geopolitically needed program in Sigi Regency.

Keywords

agrarian reform TORA program policy determinatio

Article Details

References

  1. Agustinus, Leo. 2014. Politik Lokal dan Otonomi Daerah. Bandung : Penerbit Alfabeta
  2. Almond G.A., dan Verba S. (1989). The Civic Culture: Political Atittudes and Democracy In Five Nations. Sage Newbury Par.
  3. Sangadji Arianto. 2002. Menuju Pengelolaan TNLL Berbasis Masyarakat. Walhi Sulteng.
  4. Aragon, Lorraine V. 1954. Fields Of The Lord: Animism, Christian Minorities, and State Development In Indonesia. Honolulu. University Of Hawai’i Press.
  5. Bachriadi, Dianto dan Wiradi, Gunawan. 2009. Enam Dekade Ketimpangan: Masalah Penguasaan Tanah di Indonesia. Jakarta. ARC, Bina Desa, dan KPA.
  6. Dianto, Lucas Anton, Carol Warren. 2013. Land For The People. . Ohio University Research In Internasional Studies.
  7. Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan (BPPK) Kementrian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. 2010. Kajian Isu Perubahan Iklim 2010. BPPK. Jakarta.
  8. Borras Jr, Saturnino M. 2005. La Via Campesina: Potret Gerakan Tani Transnasional. Garis Pergerakan.
  9. Dunleavy, P. 1981. Professions and Policy Change: Notes Toward A Model ofIdeological Corporatism. Public Administration.
  10. D’Andrea, Claudia. 2013. Kopi, Adat dan Modal : Teritorialisasi dan Identitas Adat di Taman Nasional Lore Lindu Sulawesi Tengah. Palu. Tanah Air Beta, Sajogyo Institute, Yayasan Tanah Merdeka.
  11. Escobar- Lemmon, M.C. 2000. The Causes and Process of Decentralization. Arizona. The University Of Arizona.
  12. Hoggart, K. 1981. Local Decision-Making Autonomy: A Review Of Conceptual And Methodological Issues. London. King’s College Press.
  13. Harvey, Barbara S., 1984. Permesta: Pemberontakan Setengah Hati. Jakarta : Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
  14. Nugroho, Riant. 2000. Otonomi Daerah, Desentralisasi di Indonesia Kajian dan Kritik Atas Kebijakan Desentralisasi di Indonesia. Jakarta Gramedia.
  15. Parson, Wayne. 2011. Public Policy: Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta. Kencana.