Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The purpose of this study was to find out how the communication climate took place in the Trashbag community activities. To see how the communication climate in the Trashbag community researchers see using five dimensions of communication climate according to Redding and Goldhaber. Namely Supportiveness or mutual support, participation, trust, openness, and high performance goals. From these five points the researchers also analyzed how the communication process was of two types, namely horizontal communication and vertical communication. In this study, researchers approached participant observation which required researchers to take part in the Sapu Jagad 2017 activity, which is a routine activity held by Trashbag every year. The results of this thesis are Trashbag members who always provide support in terms of decision making and when members will carry out their respective duties. Palu Trashbag members and Jagad Sweep committee also participate voluntarily. Members / volunteers Trashbag put so far have had a sense of trust in each other member but not yet comprehensive. Trashbag is a community that implements a non-binding flexible system so that members can be more open. When all members feel open to each other to achieve the community's vision and mission according to researchers, it can be more maximal.

Keywords

Climate Communication Trashbag Community

Article Details

How to Cite
Desrianita, D. (2018). COMMUNICATION CLIMATE ON PALU TRASHBAG COMMUNITIES. Social Humanity: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 56-80. https://doi.org/10.22487/j.sochum.v2i1.1317

References

  1. Arifin, Anwar. 1984. Strategi Komunikasi Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas. Bandung : ARMICO
  2. Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta : Kencana Predana Media Group
  3. Cangara, Hafied. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  4. Chatia Hastasari. 2007. Menggagas Pencitraan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal
  5. Curtis, Dan B., Floyd, James J., Winsor, Jerry L., 2005. Komunikasi Bisnis dan Profesional. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  6. Effendi, Onong Uchjana. 2013. Ilmu Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  7. Emzir. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan : Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers
  8. Jalaludin, Rakhmat. 1994. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  9. Kriyantono, Rachmat. 2006. Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana
  10. Littlejohn, Stephen W & Karen A. Foss, 2009. Teori Komunikasi, edisi 9. Jakarta : Salemba Humanika
  11. Mardalis. 2010. Metode Penelitian (suatu pendekatan proposal). Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
  12. Miftah, Thoha, 2010. Kepemimpinan dan Manajemen. Devisi Buku Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
  13. Moleong, J, Lexy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  14. Muhammad, Arni, 1995, Komunikasi Organisasi, Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
  15. Muhammad, Arni. 2003. Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti
  16. Muhammad, Arni. 2004. Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
  17. Pace, R. Wayne dan Faules, Don F. 2000. Komunikasi Organisasi Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
  18. Ruslan, Rosady. 2008. Manajemen Public Relations & Media Komunikasi. Jakarta : PT. Rajagrafindo Persada
  19. Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
  20. Wiryanto, 2005. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. Jakarta : PT. Grasindo
  21. Wursanto. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Organisasi. Yogyakarta : Andi
  22. www.menlhk.go.id di akses tanggal 20 April 2017 Pukul 19:35