Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 30, 2023
Published
Jun 2, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 87 Download : 90

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to see the social division in the community based on clans (clans) in the 2015 Pohan Jae village head election. The problem in this study is that the people of Pohan Jae village still vote based on clans. Differences in clans make people divided based on clan ties (clans) in choosing candidates for village heads. Pohan Jae Village is one of the villages in North Tapanuli. The majority of the villagers are Toba Batak tribes consisting of the Simajuntak, Panjaitan, Napitupulu, Nadapdap, Purba, Pardede and Galingging clans. The Toba Batak tribe is known to have strong primordial ties, so in village head elections clans (clans) play an important role in attracting voters. In the 2015 village head election, there were two candidates for village head who contested, namely B.Panjaitan and T.Simanjuntak. The village head candidates come from two different clans but are still within the same scope, namely Batak Toba. This clan difference is allegedly a factor causing social division in society based on clans. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach. Data collection was done by interview and literature study. Data analysis is done by triangulation. The results of the study were that the Pohan Jae village community was divided based on clan segmentation in the 2015 village head election. This social division occurred because the two candidates for village head who competed came from the same ethnicity, namely Toba Batak. 

Keywords

Segmentation Clan Election Head Village Pohan Jae

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Reinventing and Tadulako University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Jurnal Reinventing, and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Reinventing are the sole and responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Users of this website will be licensed to use materials from this website following the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Please use the materials accordingly.

 

Jurnal Reinventing is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License

You are free to:

  • Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

References

  1. Antlöv, H. (2019). Community Development and the Third Wave of Decentralisation in Indonesia : The Politics of the 2014 Village Law. Swedish Journal of Anthropology.
  2. Basrowi & Suwandi. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Rineka Cipta.
  3. Bruner, E. M. (1961). Urbanization and Ethnic Identity in North Sumatra. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1961.63.3.02a00040
  4. Bruner, E. M. (2014). The expression of ethnicity in Indonesia. In Urban Ethnicity. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315013299
  5. Bungin, B. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rineka Cipta.
  6. Charles F, A. (1992). Kehidupan Politik dan Perubahan Sosial. Tiara Wacana.
  7. Giddens, A. (2004). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration: Elements of the theory of structuration. In Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn.
  8. Irawan, N., & Rochmiatun, E. (2022). Relasi Dukun Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa (Studi Kasus Pemilihan Kepala Desa Sawah Pada Tahun 2017). Ampera: A Research Journal on Politics and Islamic Civilization, 3(03). https://doi.org/10.19109/ampera.v3i03.12844
  9. Jacobs, N. G., & Roosens, E. E. (1991). Creating Ethnicity: The Process of Ethnogenesis. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/328835
  10. Klinken, G. van. (2007). The combative ‘i’: State domination and indonesian self-writing. Life Writing. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484520701559737
  11. Lijphart, A. (1977). Majority rule versus democracy in deeply divided societies. Politikon. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589347708704717
  12. Niemeyer, K. (2013). Manuel CASTELLS (2009), Communication Power. Communication. https://doi.org/10.4000/communication.4589
  13. Nordholt, H. S. (2012). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: Strengthening citizenship or regional elites? In Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155011-26
  14. Pelzer, K. (1988). Teoan Keboen dan Petani : Politik Kolonial dan Perjuangan Agraria di Sumatera Timur. Sinar Harapan.
  15. Putri, M. I. D., Arifani, N., Ratnasari, D., Auliavia, M. V., & Nuriyah, S. (2020). Politik dan Tradisi: Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.36451/j.isip.v17i2.46
  16. Pye, L. W. (1994). China’s Quest for National Identity. Edited by Lowell Dittmer and Samuel S. Kim. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993. 305p. $42.50 cloth, $16.95 paper. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944760
  17. Schulte Nordholt, H. G. C., & van Klinken, G. (2014). M. Isa Sulaiman (1951-2004). In Renegotiating Boundaries. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004260436_003
  18. Sugiono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Sugiyono. Mode Penelitian Kualitatif.
  19. Sutoro, E. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia. In Academia.Edu.
  20. Williams, R. M., Glazer, N., & Moynihan, D. P. (1964). Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Peurto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City. American Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092140
  21. Young, N., & Smith, A. D. (1976). Theories of Nationalism. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2062972