Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 6, 2023
Published
Dec 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 390 Download : 452

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the problems faced by the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government is public information disclosure because it is still considered unable to create optimal information disclosure. As an effort to strengthen accountability and governance, the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government launched a digital platform "Jakarta Kini" (JAKI). The researcher aims to find out and analyze the application of digital democracy values and the impact of implementation in the use of the JAKI platform. Qualitative was chosen as the method in the research by taking data using literature study to complete the data during the research. The results obtained in the research are the application of the JAKI application with its various features has been fulfilled and in accordance with the characteristics of digital democracy in providing public information, creating political deliberation for the community to empower the community in the political decision process. The public response to complaints on this application can be quite enthusiastic to get involved and report various public problems through the complaint feature in the JAKI application. The existence of the JAKI application launched by the DKI Jakarta Provincial Government can be a motivation for other regions to develop similar services to meet the demands of the community in digital convenience.

Keywords

Digital democracy Governance JAKI Public Policy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Reinventing and Tadulako University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Jurnal Reinventing, and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Reinventing are the sole and responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Users of this website will be licensed to use materials from this website following the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. Please use the materials accordingly.

 

Jurnal Reinventing is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License

You are free to:

  • Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  • The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

References

  1. Andriyanto, D., Said, F., Titiani, F. and Erni, E. (2021). Analisis Kesuksesan Aplikasi Jakarta Kini (JAKI) Menggunakan Model Delone and McLean. Paradigma - Jurnal Komputer dan Informatika, 23(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.31294/p.v23i1.10018.
  2. Antara, I.G.M.Y. and Suryana, I.G.P.E. (2020). Pengaruh Tingkat Kepadatan Penduduk Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Provinsi Bali. Media Komunikasi Geografi, 21(1), p.63. doi:https://doi.org/10.23887/mkg.v21i1.22958.
  3. Berg, S. and Hofmann, J. (2021). Digital Democracy. Internet Policy Review, 10(4).
  4. Bps.go.id. (2019). BPS Provinsi DKI Jakarta. [online] Available at: https://jakarta.bps.go.id/indicator/12/124/1/3-1-1-penduduk-laju-pertumbuhan-penduduk-distribusi-persentase-penduduk-kepadatan-penduduk-rasio-jenis-kelamin-penduduk-menurut-provinsi-kabupaten-kota-kecamatan.html.
  5. Bubandt, N. (2006). Sorcery, corruption, and the dangers of democracy in Indonesia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 12(2), pp.413–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00298.x.
  6. Chadwick, A. (2009). The Internet and politics in flux.
  7. Coleman, S. (2005). E-democracy and the UK parliament. In Handbook of Public Information Systems , pp.651–662.
  8. Daffa, F.A. and Nugraha, S.B. (2021). Utilization of Jaki Application in Improving Public Services in DKI Jakarta. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education & Social Sciences (ICESS 2021), 578. doi:https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210918.021.
  9. Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four ‘positions’. New Media & Society, 13(6), pp.855–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810389569.
  10. Ernawati, D., Dwiarto, R., Aini, Y.N., Asropi, A. and Harsiwi, N.D. (2023). Responsive public complaint service innovation:The JAKI Application case in DKI Provincial Government. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, [online] 8(1), pp.1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v8i1.9136.
  11. Furuholt, B. and F. Wahid, "E-Government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: The Case of Sragen," Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2008, pp. 411-411, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.134
  12. Gilardi, F. (2016). Digital democracy. How Digital Democracy is Changing Democracy and Its Study.
  13. Hagen, M. (2000). Digital democracy and political systems: Issues of Theory and Practice.
  14. Hague, B. N., & Loader, B. (Eds.). (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. Psychology Press.
  15. Hollyer, J.R., Rosendorff, B.P. and Vreeland, J.R. (2011). Democracy and Transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), pp.1191–1205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000880.
  16. Kusumastuti, A. and Ahmad Mustamil Khoiron (2019a). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. [online] lib.unnes.ac.id. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo. Available at: https://lib.unnes.ac.id/40372/
  17. Kutha Ratna, N. (1944). Metodologi Penelitian Kajian Budaya Ilmu sosial Humaniora pada umumnya.
  18. Lenk, K. (2005). Electronic support of citizen participation in planning processes. In Digital Democracy (pp. 101-110). Routledge.
  19. Mapston, B. N. (2018). Digital Activism and Contemporary Social Movements: A Case Study of the Black Lives Matter Global Network.
  20. Mcleod, R.H. (2005). The struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), pp.367–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910500117289.
  21. Melucci, A., & Avritzer, L. (2000). Complexity, cultural pluralism and democracy: collective action in the public space. Social Science Information, 39(4), 507-527.
  22. Moleong (2007). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif / penulis, Prof. DR. Lexy J. Moleong, M.A. | OPAC Perpustakaan Nasional RI. [online] opac.perpusnas.go.id. Available at: https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305.
  23. Nair, P. (2007, December). E-Governance: A step towards digital democracy. In 5th International Conference on E-Governance: Foundations of EGovernment (pp. 28-30).
  24. Powley, E., & Anderlini, S. N. (2004). Democracy and governance. Inclusive Security, Sustainable Peace: A Toolkit for Advocacy and Action.
  25. Rahmawati, R. and Firman, F. (2017). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Aplikasi Qlue Di Wilayah Jakarta Utara. ARISTO, [online] 5(2), pp.386–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v5i2.542.
  26. Ramadhan, F., Setiyono, B., Sos, S., & Supratiwi, S. IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PERDA DKI JAKARTA NO. 14 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG SISTEM PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN PENGANGGARAN TERPADU MELALUI E-MUSREMBANG.
  27. Sinpeng, A., & Tapsell, R. (2021). From Grassroots Activism to Disinformation: Social Media Trends in Southeast Asia. The Institute’s research.
  28. Sofiana, A. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Open Government Melalui Aplikasi Jakarta Kini (Jaki) Pada Fitur Jak-Respon Dalam Penyebarluasan Informasi Publik. Journal of Social Contemplativa, 1(1), 45-53.
  29. Sukma, F.L. (2021). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN FITUR JAKLAPOR APLIKASI JAKI TERHADAP KEPUASAN MASYARAKAT PADA KINERJA PELAYANAN PUBLIK PEMPROV DKI JAKARTA - Repository UPN Veteran Jakarta. Upnvj.ac.id. [online] doi:http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/12812/1/ABSTRAK.pdf.
  30. Taryana, A., El Mahmudi, M.R. and Bekti, H. (2022). ANALISIS KESIAPSIAGAAN BENCANA BANJIR DI JAKARTA. JANE - Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 13(2), p.302. doi:https://doi.org/10.24198/jane.v13i2.37997.
  31. Tormey, S. (2015). The end of representative politics. John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Tsagarousianou, R. (2000). Electronic democracy in practice: one, two, three... countless variants. Hermès, (1), 233-246.
  33. Weiss, T.G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), pp.795–814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713701075.
  34. Widiachristy, L. and Rachmanto, A.S. (2021). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JAKARTA SMART CITY APPLICATION IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY RESILIENCE IN FACING FLOOD RISK. Journal of Architecture& ENVIRONMENT, 20(1), p.45. doi:https://doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v20i1.a9034.
  35. Wirtz, B. W., Daiser, P., & Binkowska, B. (2018). E-participation: A strategic framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 1-12.