Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Generation Z is often labeled as a lazy and apathetic generation. However, on the other hand, they are one of the groups of voters whose votes dominate and have the potential to influence election results. Therefore, this research is here to explore how this generation, which is often considered 'lazy' and 'apathetic', participates and uses their voting rights in elections, especially in Parigi Moutong Regency. The initial question raised is whether the labels 'lazy' and 'apathetic' can also be applied in the political context, namely the democratic process. To answer this, the research focuses on two factors that influence Generation Z's voting preferences, namely candidate image and political policy issues, using James S. Coleman's Rational Choice theory as an analytical framework to test the rationality of their political choices.
Methods: This study uses a quantitative research method with an explanatory approach. Data collection was carried out through a survey with an online questionnaire as a tool (G-Form), Generation Z was the respondent in this study with the following conditions; has been registered in the permanent voter list (DPT) and participated in making choices in the 2024 elections, and is from Parigi Moutong Regency.
Results: The results show that the candidate's political issues and policies offered are factors with a higher influence (51.5% relationship and 26.5% influence) than the candidate's image (47.2% relationship and 22.2% influence) on Generation Z's voting behavior. Other preferences are influenced by different factors.
Conclusion: The findings imply that it is important for candidates and campaign teams to focus more attention on developing and disseminating vision-mission, work programs, and policies that suit the needs of Generation Z, while maintaining a positive image and attractive personal branding.
Article Details
References
- Adityara, S., & Rakhman, R. T. (2019). Karakteristik Generasi Z dalam Perkembangan Diri Anak Melalui Visual. Semina Nasional Seni Dan Desain: “Reinvensi Budaya Visual Nusantara,” September, 401–406.
- Bagaskoro, A. (2023). Anomali Perilaku Pemilih Generasi Z di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor ….
- Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and Voting. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 35–50.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The America Voter.
- Coleman, J. S. (1944). Foundations of social theory-Harvard University Press (1994).
- Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social Theory , Social Research , and a Theory of Action. 91(6), 1309–1335.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative,Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
- Dolot, A. (2018). New trends in management The Characteristics of Generation Z. E-Mentor, 2(2), 44–50.
- Fauzi, A. M. (2019). Perilaku Pemilih Menjelang Pemilu 2019. 40–48.
- Firmanzah. (2007). Sosial Politik Marketin g Pemilih.
- Fitriyani, A., Rosadi, A. D., Laila, F., Puspita, D., & Imron, A. (2024). Generasi z Mempengaruhi Keputusan Dalam Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2024. 10(April).
- Hasdiana, U. (2018). Theoritical Review : Teori Perbedaan Generasi. Analytical Biochemistry, 11(1), 1–5.
- Hutajulu, S., Ginting, S., & Manasyekh, Y. (2024). Digitalisasi Budaya Politik Melalui Peran Generasi Milenial dan Gen Z Di Indonesia. 2.
- Keputusan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah Nomor 124 Tahun 2023 (2023).
- Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology a step-by-step guide for beginners.
- Newman, B. I. (1994). The Marketing Of The President Political Marketing as Campign Strategy.
- Oral, U. (2023). The Use of Media by Turkey’s Generation Z as a Source for Political Information. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(51), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1214406
- Pageno, I. (2023). Faktor-faktor Mempengaruhi Implementasi Kebijakan dan Dana Desa di Kecamatan Marawola Kabupaten Sigi (Vol. 2, Issue 22).
- Peters, B. G. (2018). American Public Policy: Promise and Performance (11th ed.). CQ Press. (p. 509). https://archive.org/details/americanpublicpo00pete_0/mode/2up
- Popkin, S. L. (1991). The Reasoning Voter Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. In Political Psychology (Vol. 14, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3791718
- Prensky, M. (2020). Tracking dynamics between digital design agencies and clients of hybrid outsourcing in the double diamond website development process. Archives of Design Research, 33(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2020.02.33.1.17
- Rosa, V. Dela, Fadhila, D., Salsabilla, N., Anwar, R. S. T., & Randa, M. (2024). Peran generasi z dalam pemilu yang bersih dan demokratis. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7, 4654–4660.
- Sarah Lestari Tampubolon , Tri Bayu Armanda , Depi Yohana Manurung, U., & Sinaga, Santiana Siboro, Limra Nababan, J. P. B. (2024). Perilaku Pemilih Gen Z Pada Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2024. Sosial : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 110–120.
- Sekar Arum, L., Amira Zahrani, & Duha, N. A. (2023). Karakteristik Generasi Z dan Kesiapannya dalam Menghadapi Bonus Demografi 2030. Accounting Student Research Journal, 2(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.62108/asrj.v2i1.5812
- Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.
- Taylor, A. H. & B. (2014). Rational Choice. In Key Concepts in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914704.n30
- Wartoyo, F. X., & Ginting, Y. P. (2024). Sosialisasi Generasi Z Dalam Partisipasi Pemilu 2024. Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, 3(02), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.58812/jmws.v3i02.963
- We Are Social. (2023). Digital 2023 Indonesia : Platfrom Social Media yang Sering Digunakan di Indonesia 2023. Wearesocial, 56.